The Going Price for Privacy

We are all familiar with the idiomatic expression, “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?”  In a piece earlier this week from “The Washington Post,” genetic-testing company, 23andMe, Inc., announced it will share data from 650,000 customers in a partnership deal with Pfizer, a global pharmaceutical company.

In a healthcare system dominated by the acronym HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), a logical first question may be: “Is that legal?” The simple answer is yes.

In a book published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCIB), the intent of HIPAA was to make health care delivery more efficient and to increase the number of Americans with health insurance coverage. Yet, study after study, details how HIPAA has actually had a negative impact on medical research.  HIPAA has created a selection bias, reduced patient participation, delayed medical advancements and caused large administrative burdens for covered entities/organizations that are required to enforce HIPAA.

Consumers, anxious to find out if they are related to Genghis Kahn, have signed consent (knowingly or not) and that data will now be shared. Yet in medical clinics around the country, some mom who is trying to get her baby immunized is signing multiple HIPAA forms because the law states that this data must be treated differently.

A few questions emerge:

Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

Related Posts: Got Milk? What Kind? Personalized Nutrition: Ready for Prime Time? 4 Key Insights from the Personalized Nutrition Conference Precision Marketing Meets Precision Medicine: Personalization in Healthcare Marketing & Communications Matters Leading the Conversation on Health Equity Big Data + Ag – Another Tool to Grow Your Farm